


TEN TOP TIPS:for families carers on ensuring good support and services for adults with severe learning disabilities whose behaviour is described as challenging |
Professor Luke Clements, Cardiff Law School, Director of the Centre for Health and Social Care Law, Cardiff Law School, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3AX
www.law.cf.ac.uk/contactsandpeople/ClementsLJ
This information sheet has been written for family carers whose relative has severe learning disabilities and behaviour described as challenging.
Is your relative aged 18 years or older?
Does your relative receive community care services?
If the answer is yes this information sheet is for you. Outlined below are ten top tips to help you get the right support for your family member.
If your relative is under 18 see:
|
A disabled person has a right to a face to face assessment with a skilled member of social services, who must identify that person’s ‘needs’ for social care support, equipment, etc. These needs must be clearly stated and the disabled person and his or her carer / representative must be given a copy of this. The assessed needs must be accompanied by a care plan1 explaining how these needs are going to be met (unless the disabled person is having a direct payment – in which case there must be a detailed explanation as to why the sum paid is sufficient to meet the needs that have been assessed). If your council says that they don’t do face to face assessments and instead send out ‘self assessment’ forms, this is unlawful.
Action:
|
Your local authority will formally decide what level of need it will meet and fund under Fair Access to Care criteria - this is known as the eligibility criteria3. When it has set this level, the law says that a disabled person’s assessed needs which meet the local authority’s eligibility criteria must be met..
NB Throughout this information sheet “meeting assessed needs” will refer to needs which meet the local authority’s eligibility criteria for funding.
As long as the individual’s needs meet the local authority’s eligibility criteria the council cannot refuse to fund these – even if it says that its budget has been cut. A person’s assessed needs must be met by the council either (1) arranging for a support services to be provided, or (2) by the disabled person receiving a ‘direct payment4’ (i.e. where the person actually receives a cash payment from the council which is used to meet the assessed needs).
Action:
|
A care plan must explain the 'how, who, what and when'. The care plan is used as a means of checking whether or not the identified needs are being met. Personal budgets5 don’t change this at all and if a council fails to provide care plans and proper explanations, they are not complying with the law.
Action:
|
In a ‘personal budget’ the council tells the disabled person how much it is spending on arranging for the support services to be provided, although the money is not actually handed to the person. The council is then supposed to encourage that person to become more involved in using the money in a way that enables them to have a better life. Many councils are switching people to this arrangement, although the law makes no mention of ‘personal budgets’. Councils should only do this if they have fully involved the disabled person. The new personal budget arrangement cannot be an excuse for making a cut - ‘personal budgets’ are about improving the quality of services and nothing more.
Action:
|
Councils can’t have blanket policies that they don’t do certain types of social care support services (e.g. ‘we don’t provide help with bathing unless this need is verified by a doctor’s note’ or ‘we don’t provide travel support anymore’ or ‘we don’t provide evening (or weekend) services’ and so on). The law requires that a person’s assessed needs have to be met. Personal budgets cannot be used to impose limitations of this nature – so councils cannot have ‘upper limits’ on the amount of financial support that can be provided: a person’s assessed needs must be met, regardless of their cost.
Action:
|
Many local authorities use ‘panels’ of various types (sometimes termed ‘allocation panels’, ‘funding panels’ or ‘purchasing panels’) as a means of rationing services. Often a social worker will have spent a considerable amount of time assessing a disabled person’s needs and will propose a care plan to a panel, only for the panel to refuse. This is generally unlawful – since assessed needs must be met – regardless of resources.
Action:
|
Councils should develop local support and services to meet local need but it can be easier and quicker to “put people” in ready made services rather than develop local individualised packages of care and support. Where the disabled person’s needs are best addressed by local support services, then the council must be able to demonstrate that it is taking active steps to arrange or commission such services (for example, that it is having urgent discussions with independent sector to increase the availability of suitable services etc). In such cases local authorities cannot simply say ‘we don’t have anything suitable, so you will either have to use a service outside our area or you will have to arrange this yourself using a personal budget’. In a court case known as R v. Islington LBC ex p Rixon (1996) the court held that local authorities had to adjust provision to meet need and not the other way around.
Some local authorities try to force disabled people, who they are funding in ‘out of county’ placements, to move back into the local authority area – even where the disabled person has settled happily and wants to remain. This can also arise where a council refuses to fund a care need, because the provider is outside its area (e.g. a respite care facility) even though it is exactly what the disabled person needs. If a disabled person is living in such an out of county placement in a care home, then this is their ‘home’ for the purposes of article 8 European Convention on Human Rights and in any event under the National Assistance Act 1948 (Choice of Accommodation) Directions 1992, all things being equal a disabled person is entitled to choose the location of his or her care home – even if it is located outside the council’s area. If the person lacks sufficient mental capacity to make this decision, then a ‘best interests’ decision will have to be taken – which must place particular emphasis on that person’s wishes as well as those interested in his or her welfare (i.e. family and friends).
Action:
|
If you believe that the Council has acted unlawfully, you should make a formal complaint to try to reach a positive outcome for you and your relative.
Action:
|
Caring can be a profoundly hard and isolating experience and it may be helpful to identify some key allies who you can draw on to support you. Many families find talking to other family carers an invaluable source of information and emotional support. To meet other family carers you may wish to join a carers support group or the Challenging Behaviour Foundation family linking scheme. If you believe your local authority are not fulfilling their duties to you or your relative you may wish to contact your local councillor or MP and ask that they write a letter of support.
Action:
|
It may be helpful to find out more or you may need to get individual advice on legal issues as appropriate. Whilst the Challenging Behaviour Foundation is happy to provide general information we are unable to provide legal advice. You may find the following organisations and resources useful.
Organisations
Disability Law Service: Provides telephone or email advice on community care law. Free to disabled people and their family carers
www.dls.org.uk Tel: 020 77919800 e-mail: advice@dls.org.uk
National Autistic Society: If your relative has an Autistic Spectrum Condition you can contact the National Autistic Society Community Care Service which offers advice and information about Community Care
www.autism.org.uk Tel: 0808 800 4104 Email communitycare@nas.org.uk
Learning Disability Helpline: Provides advice and information on community care in England, Wales & Northern Ireland.
England: Telephone: 0808 808 1111 Email: help@mencap.org.uk
Northern Ireland: 0808 808 1111 Email: mencapni@mencap.org.uk
Wales: 0808 808 1111 Email: information.wales@mencap.org.uk
Resources
Carers and their Rights, (2010). Professor Luke Clements. It is available on the internet free of charge at www.lukeclements.co.uk/publications/index.html
Using the Law to Fight Cuts to Disabled People’s Services, (2011). Doughty Street Chambers and Irwin Mitchell Solicitors. Available on the internet free of charge www.ncb.org.uk/edcm
Get your rights: What to do if your service is cut? (2011). MENCAP. Available on the internet free of charge www.mencap.org.uk Tel: 0808 808 1111
Action:
|
Jargon Buster
1. Care plan: a written statement of individual assessed needs identified during a Care Assessment. It sets out what support you should get, why, when, and details of who is meant to provide it. Individuals are entitled to a copy of their care plan.
2. Care assessment: also known as an “assessment of needs” is carried out by the Social Services department of an individual’s local council and is the first step towards getting help and support with care. The assessment looks at an individual’s needs and determines what services and support a person is entitled to.
3. Eligibility criteria: individuals needs are graded into four bands “critical”, “substantial”, “moderate” and low” as set out in a document called “Fair Access to care services”.
Each local authority sets its own individual eligibility criteria to decide which of the four levels of need are entitled to receive funding for social care services and support. For example, a council may decide to only fund needs which are assessed as critical or substantial.
4. Direct payments: cash payments made to individuals who have been assessed as needing services, instead of social service provisions e.g. day centre placement
5. Personal budgets: “A personal budget may be taken:
(ADASS 2009)
6. Best interests meeting: A best interest meeting can be arranged when an individual lacks the capacity to make a decision for themselves. The people at the meeting should discuss what the best course of action is for the individual who lacks capacity. It should not be the personal views of the people, instead they should consider the current and future interests of the individual who lacks capacity, weigh them up and decide which course of action is, on balance, the best course of action.
Last updated: May 2011
Download 'Ten Top Tips' information sheet in pdf format